Judges still have wide powers to restrict reporting and media access

July 1, 2009


Family courts were opened to the press at the end of April but as yet there has been remarkably little reporting of them. Sanchia Berg spent a fortnight in different family courts to find out why.

The judge was happy for me to sit in his courtroom, the duty clerk informed me, so I walked in and found a seat in the corner.

This was my first day at the Principal Registry in Holborn – London’s equivalent of the county court family division.

These courtrooms are quite informal, rather like seminar rooms, except for the little raised area where the judge and clerk sit.

The judge asked me to introduce myself. I explained that I simply wanted to observe the processes of the family courts, and report what I could, anonymised of course.

The judge seemed quite pleased – but the barristers looked uncomfortable.

One became quite agitated. He explained he represented the children’s mother – and he needed to check what she thought about it. He went out to find her.

As we waited, we heard muffled screams coming from the corridor outside – and the sound of someone running. After a short while, the barrister came back.

“I think you all heard my client’s reaction,” he said. The mother had violently objected to me being there. In fact, she said she would not be present if I was.

The judge invited the barristers to give their view. They said they did not know if the case could go forward if the mother was not there – that it would not be in the best interests of the children involved.

The judge didn’t ask me to leave, however I decided to go – I didn’t want my presence to affect the case.

It was a reminder of how intensely personal these cases are.

As they assess whether a parent is the best carer for their child, experts will talk about parents’ mental ability, their IQ, their personality, their ability to learn.

They talk about their state of mind, the condition of their home, and the nature of their relationships. Even though any reporting has to be anonymous – the reporter’s still there listening.

‘Lose-lose situation’

Yet that was the only case I had to leave.

I did hear part of several cases, but then stumbled across one where the local authority had applied to take several children from one family into care.

I followed that through its last few days – hearing evidence from the father, and the court-appointed guardian, the final submissions and the judgement a few days later.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: